Last updated on September 20th, 2020 at 08:47 pm | This article was published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.
Â List of New Cars To Avoid.
New cars just arenâ€™t what they used to be. No, weâ€™re not getting all crotchety and decrying the evolution in styling and technological breakthroughs that have literally reinvented the automobile during the last quarter millennium. Rather, weâ€™re bemoaning the fact that, unlike as in past model years. Thereâ€™s a dearth of truly wretched cars on the market for us to openly and readily ridicule. ALSO READ–Engineer growth mobile apps.
We consulted J.D. Power for the latest results in the companyâ€™s initial quality and long-term reliability surveys and its scores for performance and design. Rankings for resale value depreciation came from the automotive valuation experts at ALG. Finally, we weighed in with no less an expert source than Consumer Reports to check which models received particularly paltry scores for performance and overall value. ALSO READ–how to mange 403 forbidden error wordpress.
Easy parking is arguably this two-passenger micro-carâ€™s only virtue. It gets decent fuel economy but any savings at the pump are negated by the carâ€™s need for premium-grade fuel. While the ForTwo is reasonably affordable. Itâ€™s rated below average for depreciation. Itâ€™s also among Consumer Reportsâ€™ lowest-scoring new cars. CR slams the unfortunate ForTwo on the basis of its â€œtiny, two-passenger cabin, a herky-jerky transmission and an under-powered engine,â€ going so far as to call the Smart, â€œa dumb choice.â€ ALSO READ–Engineer growth mobile apps.
The eccentric iQ is a micro-sized two-door hatchback with oddly aligned seating thatâ€™s said to accommodate three adults and one small child. Though itâ€™s best driven solo, if at all. It gets below average ratings across the board for residual value from ALG and initial quality, performance and reliability from J.D. Power. Itâ€™s also among Consumer Reportsâ€™ lowest rated cars (to quote CR: â€œThe rear seat is awful, the cabin is loud and acceleration is molasses-likeâ€).
Long in need of a refresh, Nissanâ€™s full-size pickup truck tends to be also-ran in an intensely brand-loyal segment. Itâ€™s handily outclassed by entries from Chevrolet/GMC, Ford and Ram, and to a lesser degree, Toyota. The Titan is rated both below average in residual value from ALG and in performance from J.D. Power. Itâ€™s also noted as being among Consumer Reportsâ€™ worst values. ALSO READ- maximize online sales leads.
Nissanâ€™s large and lumbering SUV is based on the Titan full-size truck and while itâ€™s roomy and capable of towing a decent-sized boat. Itâ€™s a handful to drive with a bouncy ride and heavy handling. The Armada gets low marks from J.D. Power for initial quality and reliability. And garners among the lowest overall scores from Consumer Reports. According to CR, â€œits overall fuel economy of 13 mpg is abysmal, reliability is poor and ownership costs are the worst in the category.â€ALSO READ–Engineer growth mobile apps.
Widely panned, Mitsubishiâ€™s return to the subcompact car market provides affordable transportation and little more. It falls short in so many regards. None the least of which is sluggish acceleration from its 74-horsepower three-cylinder engine. Not only does J.D. Power give it below average marks for performance. Itâ€™s among Consumer Reportsâ€™ lowest scoring models.Â ALSO READ–Engineer growth mobile apps.